I’m all for saving money, but stories like this one in today’s NYT always get my proverbial goat. It’s a review of two books, one of which emphasizes that saving one million dollars by the time you retire is officially not enough.
“Indeed, writing that you need at least a seven-figure nest egg is perhaps the biggest contribution that Michael K. Farr makes in A Million Is Not Enough,” the reviewer writes.
Ugh. That reminds me of the people who say you just can’t live in New York City on less than $150K a year. You want to shake them and say: “Gee — don’t about six million people do exactly that?”
A few facts for those who live outside Manhattan:
— The median household net worth in America is about $55,000. That number is, if you hadn’t noticed, substantially less than $1 million.
— Even for people about to retire (the 55-64 age bracket), the median is $112,000. (See here.)
— If you remove home equity — which is probably fair, since retirees can’t eat their guest bedroom — median net worth for families nearing retirement is just $32,000.
On one hand, those numbers are a bit scary, and they’re an excellent reminder that it is important to save, invest, et cetera at a young age. But on the other, they’re also proof that the vast majority of Americans will not have anything close to $1 million at retirement, and yet they will survive. Setting a goal that, for most Americans, seems so astronomically absurd only pushes them into inaction.
No comments yet.
Joshua Benton is the director of the Nieman Digital Journalism Project at Harvard University, among other things. Before that, he was a staff writer and columnist for The Dallas Morning News. (More.)
About | Archives | Contact | Writing | Photos | Links | Wish
06 Aug: COLUMN: A year’s wait can make all the difference for your child
Any opinions expressed here are solely mine, and not those of my employer. In many cases, they may not even be mine.
Comment Preview
said: